Javier Hipolito solid ground v. Golston, 366 NE 2d 744 - Mass: Supreme good Court 1977. About 2 P.M. on Sunday, August 24, 1975, the dupe, a white man thirty-four years old, came out of a store in Dorchester and walked toward his car. Siegfried Golston, a black man of nineteen, walked butt end him and hit him on the head with a baseball bat. The defendant then went into a building, changed his clothes, and crossed the street to the store, where he worked. When asked whence he had hit the man, he s countenance, For kicks. The victim was taken to a hospital. There a large portion of the summit of his skull was outside to relieve pressure on his reason, and he disenfranchised with the aid of an artificial respirator. Later the victim died. Golston was charged with clear up in first degree. There was evidence of great and extraordinary(predicate) emphasis in the act, which caused a 4 inch stinger on the side of the skull. There is no requirement that the defendant know that his act was extremely atrocious or evil which meat he had no mens rea. When asked why he did it he give tongue to for kicks. He has actus reus because he hit the victim with a baseball bat.
The appellate court affirmed his conviction.  Among legion(predicate) separate errors, he claims that the death of the victim was not in good erect established. They said that the exam judge correctly accepted the health check concept of brain death; alternatively, any error in this respect was blameless beyond a reasonable doubt. They in any case overrule the defendants other assignments of error. natio n v. Pinnick, 354 Mass. 13, 15 n. 1 (1968! ). Commonwealth v. Vanetzian, 350 Mass. 491, 493 n. 1 (1966).Commonwealth v. Macloon, one hundred one Mass. 1, 6 (1869). Commonwealth v. Parker, 2 Pick. 550, 558 (1824)If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment